“What is usually lacking in the conventional academic approach to philosophy is an extensive inquiry into the relations between thinking and doing.” #AnatolRapoport 1953 “Operational Philosophy: Integrating Knowledge and Action”
IThank you David for making this old item surface.
I used Anatol Rapoport’s ‘Operational Philosophy’ as a supplementary text in a math course I taught at UofT.
Why am I still interested in it today?
Because systems thinking, even if we pull together all the varietes, such as cybernetics, system dynamics, ecosystems, GSTh, is still not enough.
We need, as I see it in 2019:
general semantics (Korzybski)
operationalism and constructivism (Brigman, Rapoport, Regoczei)
conceptual analysis (Sowa)
Rapoport was offering a ‘doing’ way of understanding semantics.
Operational semantics.
The work has not yet been continued as of today.
I was fortunate to see Anatol Rapoport in person, speak on General Systems and Peace, at the ISSS 1998 Atlanta meeting. There’s a digest of his talk at http://isss.org/98transc/jl220930.htm .
There is history of science as digests of other ISSS meetings at http://isss.org/world/retrospectives , in the days before blogging became popular.
Great book on operational philosophy by Rapaport. Thanks for posting the link to it on archive.org, I can tell its a great read after reading just the first 4 pages!