Tolman: Context in Systems Changes and Neuroscience (Episodic Memory)

Hello All,

Finally had a few moments to read through @daviding post re: Causal Texture, Contextualism and Contexural (http://coevolving.com/blogs/index.php/archive/causal-texture-contextural-contextualism/) and it reminded me of some of my thesis work; especially the connection between Tolman. Posted on LinkedIn and re-posting here.

-----------------------,

Of particular interest was the presence of Tolman’s work. Tolman demonstrated that animal behaviour was more complex than simple stimulus-response which was divergent from mainstream thought at that time.

Tolman’s work was central to my thesis work, as, without his demonstration that behaviour is underpinned by cognition, and, not only that, but that behaviour is influenced by environment; it would have been difficult to justify and argument the notion that behaviours influenced by environment also play a role in (episodic) memory formation. Our memories, and their information, is not only scaffolded by spatio-temporal information but of factors beyond that:

“1. a spatio-temporal field; 2. primary qualities qualifying locations in that field; 3. natural laws determining the configurations of locations qualified by primary qualities; 4. secondary qualities; 5. laws determining the correlations of secondary qualities with configurations of primary qualities; and, 6. laws determining the sequences of secondary qualities”

  • Z

For me, there’s a lot to be learned by observing the evolution of the state-of-the-art in systems research.

In the first of four lectures at OCADU in winter 2020, I presented a slide summarizing a distinction between behavioral psychology and ecological psychology.

Back in 1934, we had the article by S. C. Pepper, followed by the Tolman & Brunswick in 1935.

In 1950, J.J. Gibson would publish The Perception of the Visual World, and would become recognized by his peers in psychology. It wasn’t until 1979 that The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception would provide more philosophical foundations leading to the idea of affordances.

In 1956, we had the launch of “Behavioral Science, A New Journal”, with James Grier Miller, as one of the leaders in General Systems Theory (that would become known as the Systems Sciences). This journal would merge in 1996 with a parallel journal to become known as Systems Research and Behavioral Science.

In 1965, Emery & Trist would publish “The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments", that would introduce the socio-ecological systems perspective (that should be framed with the socio-psychological and socio-technical).

In 2000, Tim Ingold published The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, that pieced together J.J. Gibson with the work of Gregory Bateson (who originated, but actually didn’t publish ecological epistemology).

So, while novices are still trying to make sense of “Ask not what’s inside your head, but what your head’s inside”, there’s been a more recent advance that has helped my understanding.

In 2017, Tim Ingold published “On Human Correspondence”, that brought the idea of being alongside – not just what’s inside your head, or what your head’s inside – that helped me with Open Innovation Learning (Ing, 2017).

I didn’t read all of this research in the sequence that they were released. For someone new to the variety of ideas in the systems sciences (i.e. the ISSS), there’s a lot to sort out.

References

Alexander, Franz, Alex Bavelas, Ralph W. Gerard, Donald G. Marquis, Jacob Marschak, James G. Miller, Anatol Rapoport, Ralph W. Tyler, and Raymond Waggoner. 1956. “Editorial: Behavioral Science, A New Journal.” Behavioral Science 1 (1): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830010102.

Emery, Fred E., and Eric L. Trist. 1965. “The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments.” Human Relations 18 (1): 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103. Anthology (1997) preprint at www.moderntimesworkplace.com/archives/ericsess/sessvol3/sessvol3.html .

Gibson, James Jerome. 1979. “The Theory of Affordances.” In The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 127–43. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Ing, David. 2017. Open Innovation Learning: Theory Building on Open Sourcing While Private Sourcing . Toronto, Canada: Coevolving Innovations Inc. https://doi.org/10.20850/9781775167211.

Ingold, Tim. 2000. “General Introduction.” In The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill , 1–7. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203466025.

Ingold, Tim. 2017. “On Human Correspondence.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23 (1): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12541.

Pepper, S.C. 1934. “The Conceptual Framework of Tolman’s Purposive Behaviorism.” Psychological Review 41 (2): 108–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0075220.

Tolman, Edward C., and Egon Brunswik. 1935. “The Organism and the Causal Texture of the Environment.” Psychological Review 42 (1): 43. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062156.

I also have not read the papers in this sequence; mind you much of my reading on this topic had been focused more on the “traditional” research; Tulving being one of them to add the temporal piece to this conversation.

It’s also interesting to see new research coming out suggesting that cognition is actually developed by and influenced with information collected through spatial and temporal elements. One such recent paper was done by Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences. “Navigating our thoughts: Fundamental principles of thinking.” ScienceDaily. ScienceDaily, 8 November 2018. <www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/11/181108142443.htm>.

Creative Commons Licence Contributions to the Open Learning Commons are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please honor the spirit of collective open learning by citing the author(s) in the context of a dialogue and/or linking back to the original source.